Popular explanations of how wings work are often erroneous and scientifically unsound. Wrong explanations may be given by well-meaning teachers and others, but false teaching may sometimes be just for convenience. Many years ago, a famous aerodynamicist, Dr. Theodore Von Karman, instructed his assistant: "When you are talking to technically illiterate people you must resort to the plausible falsehood instead of the difficult truth." (From Stories of a 20th Century Life, ISBN 0-915760-04-5, by W.R. Sears, former assistant to Von Karman). Falsehood, whether intentional or not, is still being taught.
The most popular theory of wing operation, which we may call Hump Theory, because it requires a wing to have a more convex upper surface as compared to the lower, is easily shown to be false. Hump theory is based on an assumption of equal transit times, that air passage over a curved upper wing surface must occur in the same length of time as air passage below where the surface is more flat, and hence of a shorter path length. In order to have the same transit time, flow at the longer path upper surface must be of greater velocity than that at the lower surface. Thus, in accordance with Bernoulli's law, it is reasoned that upper surface pressure must then be less than at the lower surface, thereby producing upward lift. Equal transit time is sometimes illustrated by representing bits of passing flow above and below an airfoil or wing as shown here:
Although Bernoulli's law is sound and well proven, this popular explanation, world-wide, of wing operation is false. Upper surface flow is indeed faster than the lower, so much so that upper surface transit time is normally less than the lower, as indicated here:
Although the assumption of equal transit time is wrong and has no basis in known physics, it can be found in books from otherwise reputable publishers such as National Geographic, Macmillan and others in this country and abroad. College level teaching of aerodynamicists and aeronautical engineers does not include equal transit time, which cannot survive mathematical investigation
The fallacy of equal transit time can be deduced from consideration of a flat plate, which will indeed produce lift, as anyone who has handled a sheet of plywood in the wind can testify.
As indicated in the above figure, air approaching the plate, such as a sheet of plywood, accelerates into the reduced above-plate pressure with increasing velocity, while air approaching below is slowed in the increased pressure, in accordance with Bernoulli. Thus faster upper surface flow can be described as a result of pressure difference rather than the cause of it. Bernoulli's "principle, "law" or "effect" states that velocity varies in inverse relation to pressure but does not assign cause-and-effect relation. Unfortunately a great amount of confusion has been generated by abuse of Bernoulli's law in erroneous cause-and-effect explanations.
Basic Newtonian principles of aerodynamic lift and propulsion include:
1. Upward lift is derived by accelerating air mass downward.
2. Forward propulsion, of propellers and jets, is gained by accelerating air mass rearward.
3. Drag is incurred through accelerating air mass forward, as by viscous coupling. For the most part this is undesirable but unavoidable.
4. Air mass recirculates upward at a rate equal to the rate at which it is displaced downward in the lift process, thus normal atmospheric mass distribution is maintained.
Sir Isaac Newton (1642-1727) provided for us laws of physics which govern aerodynamic lift. His first law is that velocity of an object, or bit of mass, changes only when the mass is acted upon by applied force. The second law states that when force is applied to a mass it accelerates, meaning changes velocity, at a rate equal to the force-to-mass ratio. The term "velocity" includes both speed and direction. Thus force is required to change direction or speed of an object. We drive our cars by operating a system of accelerators. These include throttle, brakes and steering wheel, as indicated here.
Newton's third law states that mass resists acceleration with equal and opposite force. Thus when a cannon accelerates a missile forward the cannon recoils in rearward direction in response to the opposite force.
In air, or other fluid, force is exerted in pressure difference. Pressure difference between two positions in air is distributed across the distance between positions as a pressure gradient, equal in magnitude at any point to the ratio of pressure difference increment, dp, to distance increment, ds, at that point. Direction of the pressure gradient is toward the position of greater pressure. The direction of air acceleration is toward lower pressure and thus opposite to the direction of pressure gradient. A tornado has reduced air pressure at its center. Thus air moving around it is accelerated toward reduced center pressure (centripetal acceleration) so that it continuously curves around the center. In opposition with equal counter-centripetal force, air pushes outward from the center, producing an outward pressure gradient, which we may refer to as a "centrifugal pressure gradient."
In a demonstration sometimes wrongly described as showing lift due to pressure reduction in moving air or pressure reduction due to flow path restriction, a ball or balloon is suspended by a jet of air. Such demonstration may be designed for the purpose of attracting attention to the vacuum cleaner section of a department store.
In reality, flow follows the surface of the ball, in a phenomenon known as "surface attachment" or "Coanda effect," producing in the curving flow an outward pressure gradient which reduces surface pressure so that the ball is drawn into the flow. Coanda effect can be demonstrated by the device shown in the following photograph.
In demonstration the coffee can is removed and the candle lighted. The small blower is then energized, blowing air above the candle with no significant effect on the flame. The blower is then stopped and the coffee can is inserted as shown. When the blower is again energized, flow follows the can surface downward and extinguishes the candle flame. The blower shown was found in an electronics flea market. Perhaps a small hair dryer operating at low speed would suffice for one wishing to produce a similar demonstration.
A popular classroom demonstration of aerodynamic lift involves a drooping sheet of paper, as in figure A, which lifts when air is blown over it. This is often mistakenly described as pressure reduction in moving air according to to "Bernoulli principle." In reality it is another demonstration of pressure reduction in a centrifugal pressure gradient. The upward pressure gradient in downwardly accelerating flow opposes atmospheric pressure, resulting in upper surface pressure reduction and lift.
If the lift in figure A were caused by "Bernoulli principle," then the paper in figure B should droop further when air is blown beneath it. However, as shown, it raises when the upward pressure gradient in downward-curving flow adds to atmospheric pressure at the paper lower surface. Curvature of flow and resulting pressure gradients is the source of lift for heavier than air aerodynamic flight. Description of lift as due to pressure gradients in curvature of above-wing and below-wing flows was given by Otto Lilienthal in his 1889 book titled Birdflight as the Basis of Aviation. Unfortunately that has been neglected for well over a century in favor of pseudoscientific descriptions. Lilienthal found that wing curvature from leading edge to trailing edge improved efficiency by adapting the wing to required curvature of flow.
Higher level theory involves Bernoulli in lift explanation, but attributes difference in velocity between above-wing and below-wing flows to "circulation," rather than equal transit time. All air movements are circulatory. Circulation begins to develop when an airfoil is started into forward motion. As indicated in the next figure, air following the surfaces is accelerated downward. Because of downward acceleration, pressure below the airfoil is increased and pressure above it is decreased. In beginning response to the pressure difference, upward recirculation of air mass occurs around the leading and trailing edges.
As forward airfoil movement continues, downward movement left behind the trailing edge divides into forward and rearward rotational patterns carrying upward recirculation around the aifoil and around the center of a receding aft vortex created in shear between downward and upward movements. Forward recirculation around the airfoil is known as "circulation" while the recirculation pattern left behind is known as the "starting vortex." The principle of conservation of angular momentum demands angular momenta of the two rotational patterns be equal and opposite. In equivalent classical teaching, Helmholtz' vortex theorems require equal and opposite vorticity.
Circulation is regenerative. Pressure difference produces circulation, and as circulation upward momentum ahead is intercepted by wing forward movement and recurved downward, more pressure difference is produced. Thus circulation increases regeneratively until reaching the limit at which it provides downward movement at the rear for flow to depart the trailing edge in the pointed direction. Circulation in excess of this would be opposed by airfoil direction. With mature circulation providing downward movement matching the need for flow departure in the pointed direction at the trailing edge, participation of the starting vortex is no longer needed or accepted, and growths of starting vortex and forward circulation cease. In this mature and stable circulation state, called the "Kutta condition," theoretical lossless lift of an airfoil is equal to the rate of circulation downward momentum produced plus an equal rate of upward recirculation momentum intercepted by airfoil forward movement. For derivation of the equation for ideal lift without losses in two-dimensional flow, click here.
Evidence of the regenerative nature of circulation and lift can be sometimes be seen in flow downstream from bridge pilings. A round piling has no departing flow direction limiting feature. This allows circulation and lift to increase until stall occurs, which is followed by lift reversal due to effects of residual boundary layer and pressures. A trail of alternating vortices occurs as circulation and lift periodically produce stall and reversal. In each reversal of circulation and lift a new starting vortex is carried downstream.
For more on regeneration of circulation of round cylinders click here.
Circulation is sometimes described as a rotational movement added to, or superimposed on, passing flow. With the added rotational component, oncoming flow can be described as rising upward ahead of an airfoil or wing, descending behind, having increased velocity above and decreased velociy below. Alternatively circulation can be considered as a transitory rotation of air which travels with the airfoil or wing through otherwise relatively still air, in a manner somewhat analogous to movement of water as it is parted laterally by a ship bow and rejoins at the stern in semicircular-like movements. Such water movements travel with the ship even though the water does not. The concept of superimposed circulation may seem a bit abstract but circulation is a real rotational movement that travels through the air with the wings of an airplane in flight. Alternate perspectives, of fixed wing in passing flow and moving wing through still air, are illustrated below.
In passing flow perspective, flow curves upward ahead of the lifting wing or airfoil toward reduced pressure above and away from increased pressure below, accelerates rearward into reduced above-wing pressure with increased rearward velocity and decreases rearward velocity below in response to increased pressure. At the trailing edge upper and lower flows merge to leave in downward direction pointed by the airfoil. Merging into common direction and pressure, upper and lower flow velocities difference ceases to exist. Downward departing flow curves upward toward being parallel to the path of flight, again in response to gradients of decreased above-wing pressure and increased below-wing pressure. In stable flight, circulation kinetic energy is recovered from flow left behind and imparted to oncoming flow ahead, through fore and aft pressure gradient couples and Bernoullian process.
In lossless stable two-dimensional lift condition, equal opposing forward and rearward couples have no net effect on circulation angular momentum, which remains constant. If angle of attack is increased, then downwash demand is increased for re-establishing the Kutta condition. Increase is momentarily shared between circulation increase and production of a new starting vortex. Angular momentum increase in wing circulation is matched by equal and opposite angular momentum production in the new vortex. When the Kutta condition is again established, growths of starting vortex and circulation cease and the starting vortex, no longer involved with circulation, is left downstream. In the opposite case, of decreased angle of attack, a portion of airfoil circulation, in excess of that permitted by the Kutta condition, is deflected by the airfoil and carried downstream as a new vortex of angular momentum equal in magnitude to that of circulation reduction and of same direction as circulation.
In two-dimensional flow of wind-tunnel wall-to-wall confinement of an airfoil section, circulation and starting vortex develop as two opposite-direction vortices formed in division of downwardly driven air into forward and rearward paths of upward recirculation. In this case the stabilized rate of upward recirculation ahead is equal to the rate of downward displacement left behind. In the case of a real wing beginning lift in open air, where there is no barrier to lateral loss around wing ends, circulation, starting vortex and wing end vortices are all part of a closed loop of recirculation vorticity, as indicated below, formed around downwardly accelerated air behind a wing. Conservation of angular momentum is maintained as angular momentum on one side of the vortex loop is matched by equal and opposite direction angular momentum on the other side.
For our purposes, air driven downward by a wing or airfoil will be termed "downwash" and upward recirculation will be termed "upwash." For a real wing in stable flight, upwash is driven upward ahead of the wing and around wing ends by pressure difference between above-wing and below-wing regions. Upwash around wing ends, in combination with downwash left behind, produces twin vortices which trail behind wing ends. The starting vortex portion of the initial loop is left behind at the beginning of trailing vortices and has virtually no lasting involvement in wing performance.Continuous production of trailing vortices involves continuous energy loss. A helicopter, which also derives lift from producing downwash, leaves a similar pair of trailing vortices behind, but helicopters can fly much slower than fixed-wing craft of comparable weight and thus can leave much more intense vortices. The following picture, courtesy of NASA, shows a vertical column of red smoke drawn into a recirculating downwash vortex left behind a slow flying fixed-wing cropduster.
If circulation changes, as necessary to accommodate changing lift conditions, strength of trailing vortices equally changes and a new starting vortex is left behind, equal and opposite in angular momentum to change of angular momentum in wing circulation. Thus conservation of angular momentum is maintained.
The body of downward air propulsion and upward recirculation is extensive, involving a large rate of air mass in wing circulation and trailing vortices. Inertial opposition of the large rate of air mass involvement to downward acceleration allows the required rate of downward air mass acceleration required for lift to be achieved with a sufficiently low effective downward velocity that the rate of kinetic energy input, proportional to mass times velocity squared production, is small enough for practical flight.
In level flight the downward momentum produced in lift is ultimately intercepted by the Earth's surface, thereby transferring airplane weight to the surface. However, a steeply banked turn may produce mostly horizontal momentum which would be retained in continued atmospheric movement. That wing lift can be effective in maneuvers of any attitude demonstrates the fact that lift at altitude is in reaction to acceleration in a large mass of circulation, not necessarily dependent on weight force transfer to the ground.
Pressure gradients which produce rising circulation ahead of a wing also produce upward recirculation around wing ends, leaving trailing vortices behind. In wind tunnel two-dimensional flow airfoil tests, trailing vortices are totally prevented by confinement of tunnel walls. For a wing operating in open air, limited confinement is effected by inertial resistance of surrounding air mass to acceleration. Longer wingspan produces greater lateral path length with greater mass inertial resistance to lateral acceleration and associated performance loss. The following figure indicates relative lift performances of equal area wings with differing span. Differing span is represented in differing "aspect ratio," the ratio of span to chord.
The lift process also produces forward and rearward thrust components, as the force vectors here indicate.
Forward thrust results from leading edge pressure reduction in the rearward curvature of rising circulation ahead. This pressure reduction, known as "leading edge suction," varies with the ratio of lift to airspeed, and on some airplanes is piped from a leading edge port, as shown below, to a stall warning horn in the cabin. Another type of stall sensor actuates when intense circulation around the wing leading edge lifts a small vane, also shown, which operates a switch connected to an electrical warning horn.
In reaction to downward and forward acceleration in redirection of circulation at the rear of a wing, lift and rearward thrust are generated. If there were no losses, the rearward thrust would be equal to the forward thrust generated in leading edge suction associated with circulation. However, the rate of rising air mass ahead of a wing is less than that of descending air mass behind because of partial upward circulation diversion into lateral loss paths around wing ends. Thus in addition to loss of lift, lateral loss around wing ends causes drag, known as "induced drag," due to rearward thrust of aft circulation redirection being greater than the forward thrust.
Longer wing spans, which provide greater air mass inertial opposition to lateral loss, are aerodynamically desirable, but limiting factors are stress due to bending moments, and space requirements for ground operations and hangaring. For special airplanes like "Voyager," which flew around the world non-stop and unrefueled, and the U2 spyplane, which flew long high altitude missions, long spans were vital.
Circulation theory is traditionally presented in a highly mathematical context for aerodynamicists and aeronautical engineers, as appropriate for aircraft engineering. Mathematical complexity and departure from Newtonian logic reduces the utility of most circulation theory books for individuals seeking basic conceptual understanding of wings and aircraft configuration.
When it was found that mathematical expression of vortex flow velocity involved the same equation as that expressing magnetic field strength induced by electrical current, trailing vortices behind wing ends became described as "induced." The physical basis for "induced" flow velocity is elusive, and authors have written different concepts of it based on differing interpretations of a statement of Ludwig Prandtl (1875-1953.)
Prandtl stated: "The wingtip vortices cause a downward motion of air at the wing, which will be shown to be responsible for the drag." (From Prandtl-Tietjens APPLIED HYDRO-AND AEROMECHANICS ISBN 0-486-60375-X). Clark Millikan, in Aerodynamics of the Airplane, (Wiley and Sons 1941) states: "The numerical computations in Prandtl's theory are identical with calculations developed long ago in the theory of electromagnetic induction, so that the adjective "induced" has been taken from the electrical field and introduced into aerodynamics. John D. Anderson, Jr., in Fundamentals of Aerodynamics, 2nd edition, 1991, ISBN 0-07-001679-8, says of trailing vortices: "The two vortices tend to drag the surrounding air with them and this secondary movement induces a small velocity component in the downward direction at the wing." Krisnamurty Karamcheti, in Principles of Ideal Fluid Aerodynamics, 1996, ISBN 0-089874-113-0, writes: "It is customary to refer to the velocity at any point in the vortex flow as the velocity induced by the vortex. It must be understood that this is simply a matter of convenience and does not mean that the vortex is actually causing the flow, for they just coexist." Clearly there is no common understanding of what "induction" or "induced" really means in aerodynamics context. Reasonably that is because the concept is, at best, an analogy.
In classical aerodynamics, which regards trailing vortices as "induced" from central cores, rather than caused by lateral loss of circulation upward movement, addition of "induced downwash" to flow is said to cause downward tilt of flow passing the wing. With lift being aerodynamic force perpendicular to relative flow, downward tilt of passing flow can account for a rearward tilt of lift, illustrated symbolically below. The rearward component of tilted lift appears as drag, known as "induced drag," because it is said to be caused by induction effects. The concept of drag due to downward tilt of passing flow has merit, but the tilt can better be described, not as due to addition of induced downwash but due to loss of circulation upwash ahead of the wing as it partially diverts into lateral paths around wing ends, making the upwash arrival angle at the wing leading edge less steep than the downwash angle at the trailing edge.
Obfuscation might have been avoided, if the electromagnetism analogy of induction not been so convenient as a substitute for Newtonian reasoning. Trailing vortices, as well as other aspects of aerodynamic lift, should be accounted for in Newtonian terms, as proposed by Dr. Jaako Hoffren, of Helsinki University of Technology in paper, AIAA 2001-0872, Quest for an Improved Explanation of Lift, presented at the Aerospace Sciences Meeting & Exhibit in Reno in 2001. If aerodynamics were commonly described in Newtonian terms, omitting induction and regarding all air mass accelerations as associated with forces of pressure difference, then high school and early college physics and mathematics courses might be enriched with basic aerodynamics topics, and false teaching of equal transit time, half-venturi theory and electromagnetism-like induction might be abandoned.
Another questionable point in classical teaching is that of describing circulation as a reaction to the starting vortex, which is usually said to be caused by viscous drag at the wing trailing edge. The reasoning involves theorems of vorticity, which require that creation of any vortex be accompanied by other opposite and equal vorticity. This is equivalent to the Newtonian principle of conservation of angular momentum. This requirement does not justify assumption that one vortex causes another of opposite rotation, as indicated by some authors. Starting vortex and circulation can readily be explained as created simultaneously in equal and opposite reactions to pressure gradients occurring when air mass is displaced by airfoil movement.
Two books by this author present basic aerodynamics in terms of Newtonian principles, as taught in high schools and college, with circulation but with less mathematical complexity than usually associated with circulation teaching. The first, soft cover, Stop Abusing Bernoulli!- How Airplanes Really Fly, ISBN 0-9646806-2-9, with 160 pages and 100 illustrations, as shown on the left, was published in 1999. The book has sold to many countries around the world, and as shown on the right, has been translated into Korean by Dr. S.K. Lee for use in Pusan National University.
Peter Garrison's review of Stop Abusing Bernoulli! in July 1999 FLYING MAGAZINE, recommends it "to all pilots and would-be pilots." However, it is no longer in print, although a few copies are still on the shelf at Academy of Model aeronautics (AMA) museum, phone 765-289-4236.. A second book, with more detail, better illustrations and hardcover, incorporates the Stop Abusing Bernoulli information, and more.
The second book, Introduction to Aerodynamics, ISBN 0-9646806-3-7, published in January, 2003, with 224 pages and 167 illustrations, begins with applicable principles of Newtonian physics explained in aerodynamics context, followed by aerodynamics of wings, airplanes, helicopters and surface effect craft explained in Newtonian context. For information and reviews posted on Amazon.com, click here.
Introduction to Aerodynamics, list $29.50 is available from Amazon.com, from Academy of Model Aeronautics (AMA)Museum bookstore at Muncie, Indiana,Phone 765-289-4236, and from DAR Corporation in Lawrence, KS, phone 785-832-0434, e-mail [email protected] For further information contact the publisher:
1900 Romine Road
Anderson, IN 46011
Discount available for libraries and educational institutions.
Author Gale Craig is retired from 35 years in General Motors Research and development. He holds the M.S. degree in physics, is licensed to teach high school physics and mathematics, is named as sole inventor in nineteen U.S. patents in widely varied areas and is a licensed pilot of 1700 hours who owns and flies a Cessna 182.
NOTE: The author again presented a one hour forum on this topic during the 2009 Experimental Aircraft Association convention at Oshkosh, WI. Thursday July 30 at 1:00 PM in the 001 Dake Corporation Pavilion. For a copy of the handout go to regenpress.com/handout.pdf
Comments or questions?
(c)Copyright 2003, 2008 Gale M. Craig
This web page may be reproduced in unbound form for non-profit individual or classroom use if printed in entirety with copyright notice.